Toll Free Industry News and Consulting - ICBTollFree.com

Find 800 number assistance

   


CONTENTS

Legend
F = Free - News and Features articles (see Registered Users below.)
P = Premium - Unlimited site access including contents listed under Additional Services for Premium Access Subscribers.
About ICB
 - Company Bio
 - Press: Articles, Quotes
   & News Releases
 - Privacy & Security
 - Site Map
 - Testimonials

Registered Users

News
 - Headlines
 - News Briefs
 - Reference Library

Features
 - .COM Miscellany
 - 1-800 Domain Names
 - 800 Miscellany
 - 800 Provider Directory
 - Ask the Expert
 - ICB Classifieds
 - Editorials
 - Industry Links
 - Search

Additional Services for Premium Access Subscribers

 - 888 Replication Specs
 - Behind the Scenes
 - Frost & Sullivan
 - Industry Insights
 - Law Library
 - Regulatory Room
 - Research Review

Contact Us
 - Advertising
 - Feedback/Questions
 - ICB Classifieds
 - ICB Consultancy
 - Reciprocal Links

Account Information

 - Change/Update Info
 - Account Activity
 - Subscribe/Upgrade
 - Renew Subscription

NEW TOLL FREE STUDY RELEASED

Burlington, VA June 27, 2002 (ICB TOLL FREE NEWS) A new study conducted by Response Marketing Group documents consumers' ability to retain toll-free numbers used as a direct response mechanism in radio advertising. The results confirm the value of vanity numbers as an advertising response tool and highlight the extent to which consumers continue to associate 'toll-free' with the 800 toll-free exchange.

The results show that vanity numbers offer significant advantages to advertisers. After listening to a radio spot only one time, 58% of the subjects could recall a vanity toll-free number. This compared favorably with 'hybrid' numbers (combinations like 800-639-HOME), which were recalled by 44% of subjects, and especially numerics, which only 8% of respondents could remember. The impact of particular toll-free exchanges on number retention was also measured. While 58% of respondents could recall a vanity number using the 800 exchange, numbers from the newer toll-free exchanges - 888, 877, 866 - could be recalled by only 41% of the subjects of the study.

'Telephone Number Recall in Radio Advertising' also measured consumers' recognition of the 800, 888, 877, and 866 exchanges as 'toll-free'. While 95% of subjects recognized the 800 exchange as toll-free, this trailed off for the newer toll-free exchanges. The 888 exchange, which has been in use the longest of the three new exchanges, was still not recognized as toll-free by 20% of the subjects. Recognition diminished dramatically for the newer exchanges - '877' was not recognized as toll-free by 67% of subjects, and 82% did not recognize '866' as toll-free.

"This is a groundbreaking piece of research," said Laura Noonan, Vice President of Marketing at Response Marketing Group. "From our own experience, we know that people hear 'toll-free' and instinctively dial '800', even when the number uses one of the newer toll free exchanges. We also wanted to quantify how people retain numeric, hybrid, and vanity numbers in a real world, advertising context. This is the first study that specifically examines these questions, and the findings are of considerable interest to anyone using vanity and toll-free numbers as direct response tools."

CONTENTS

Copyright © 1995 - 2007 ICB. Inc. All rights reserved. "ICB Toll Free News" is a trademark of ICB Inc. ICB Inc. assumes no responsibility for use or misuse of information contained herein and / or accessible via this site. ICB Inc. cannot and does not vouch for the accuracy and / or usability of any of the contained or linked-to information, and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions.