
CONTENTS
Legend
F = Free - News and Features articles (see Registered Users below.)
P = Premium - Unlimited site access including contents listed under Additional Services for Premium Access Subscribers.
About ICB
- Company Bio
- Press: Articles, Quotes & News Releases
- Privacy & Security
- Site Map
- Testimonials
Registered Users
News
- Headlines
- News Briefs
- Reference Library
Features
- .COM Miscellany
- 1-800 Domain Names
- 800 Miscellany
- 800 Provider Directory
- Ask the Expert
- ICB Classifieds
- Editorials
- Industry Links
- Search
Additional Services for Premium Access Subscribers
- 888 Replication Specs
- Behind the Scenes
- Frost & Sullivan
- Industry Insights
- Law Library
- Regulatory Room
- Research Review
Contact Us
- Advertising
- Feedback/Questions
- ICB Classifieds
- ICB Consultancy
- Reciprocal Links
Account Information
- Change/Update Info
- Account Activity
- Subscribe/Upgrade
- Renew Subscription
|
|
NEW TOLL FREE STUDY RELEASED
|
Burlington, VA June 27, 2002 (ICB TOLL FREE NEWS) A new study conducted by Response Marketing Group documents consumers' ability to retain toll-free numbers used as a direct response mechanism in radio advertising. The results confirm the value of vanity numbers as an advertising response tool and highlight the extent to which consumers continue to associate 'toll-free' with the 800 toll-free exchange.
The results show that vanity numbers offer significant advantages to advertisers. After listening to a radio spot only one time, 58% of the subjects could recall a vanity toll-free number. This compared favorably with 'hybrid' numbers (combinations like 800-639-HOME), which were recalled by 44% of subjects, and especially numerics, which only 8% of respondents could remember. The impact of particular toll-free exchanges on number retention was also measured. While 58% of respondents could recall a vanity number using the 800 exchange, numbers from the newer toll-free exchanges - 888, 877, 866 - could be recalled by only 41% of the subjects of the study.
'Telephone Number Recall in Radio Advertising' also measured consumers' recognition of the 800, 888, 877, and 866 exchanges as 'toll-free'. While 95% of subjects recognized the 800 exchange as toll-free, this trailed off for the newer toll-free exchanges. The 888 exchange, which has been in use the longest of the three new exchanges, was still not recognized as toll-free by 20% of the subjects. Recognition diminished dramatically for the newer exchanges - '877' was not recognized as toll-free by 67% of subjects, and 82% did not recognize '866' as toll-free.
"This is a groundbreaking piece of research," said Laura Noonan, Vice President of Marketing at Response Marketing Group. "From our own experience, we know that people hear 'toll-free' and instinctively dial '800', even when the number uses one of the newer toll free exchanges. We also wanted to quantify how people retain numeric, hybrid, and vanity numbers in a real world, advertising context. This is the first study that specifically examines these questions, and the findings are of considerable interest to anyone using vanity and toll-free numbers as direct response tools."
|
|